Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Commitments and Contingencies

v3.25.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 26, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842. The majority of the Company’s long-term operating lease agreements are for its retail locations, distribution centers, and corporate office, which expire in various years through 2055. Most of these agreements are retail leases wherein both the land and building are leased. The Company also has ground leases in which only the land is leased. The initial lease terms for the Company’s retail locations, distribution centers, and corporate office typically range from 10-20 years. The majority of the Company’s leases also include options to extend, which are factored into the recognition of their respective assets and liabilities when appropriate based on management’s assessment of the probability that the options will be exercised. Lease payments used in measurement of the lease liability typically do not include executory costs, such as taxes, insurance, and maintenance, unless those costs can be reasonably estimated at lease commencement. Additionally, one building lease contains variable lease payments, which are determined based on a percentage of retail sales over a contractual level, and the Company subleases real estate within one of its distribution centers to a third party. Certain of the lease agreements include escalating rents over the lease terms, which, under ASC 842, results in rent being expensed on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease that commences on the date the Company has the right to control the property. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants that would reasonably be expected to have a material impact on the business.
When readily determinable, the rate implicit in the lease is used to discount lease payments to present value; however, substantially all of the Company’s leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. If the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses a third party to assist in the determination of a secured incremental borrowing rate, determined on a collateralized basis, to discount lease payments based on information available at lease commencement. The secured incremental borrowing rate is estimated based on yields obtained from Bloomberg for U.S. consumers with a BB credit rating and is adjusted for collateralization as well as inflation. As of December 26, 2024 and December 28, 2023, the Company’s weighted average discount rate was 5.8% and 5.7%, respectively. As of both December 26, 2024 and December 28, 2023, the weighted average remaining lease term of the Company’s leases was approximately 12 years.
Lease Costs
The table below presents components of lease expense for operating leases.
Fiscal Year Ended
in thousands Classification December 26,
2024
December 28,
2023
December 29,
2022
Fixed operating lease cost: Selling and store operating $ 178,343  $ 157,106  $ 139,603 
Cost of sales 25,955  24,058  25,465 
Pre-opening 13,679  15,171  9,971 
General and administrative 4,119  4,161  4,622 
Total fixed operating lease cost $ 222,096  $ 200,496  $ 179,661 
Variable lease cost (1):
Selling and store operating $ 69,785  $ 57,527  $ 49,605 
Cost of sales 4,184  4,009  3,894 
Pre-opening 674  976  666 
General and administrative 2,024  1,420  787 
Total variable lease cost $ 76,667  $ 63,932  $ 54,952 
Sublease income Cost of sales (2,758) (2,722) (2,722)
Total operating lease cost (2)
$ 296,005  $ 261,706  $ 231,891 
(1)Includes variable costs for common area maintenance, property taxes, and insurance on leased real estate.
(2)Excludes short-term lease costs, which were immaterial for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2024, December 28, 2023, and December 29, 2022.
Undiscounted Cash Flows
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 26, 2024 were as follows:
in thousands
Amount
2025 $ 220,563 
2026 215,662 
2027 204,385 
2028 183,446 
2029 170,959 
Thereafter
1,156,957 
Total minimum lease payments (1) (2)
2,151,972 
Less: amount of lease payments representing interest
662,044 
Present value of future minimum lease payments
1,489,928 
Less: current obligations under leases
138,646 
Long-term lease obligations
$ 1,351,282 
(1)Future lease payments exclude approximately $444.9 million of legally binding minimum lease payments for operating leases signed but not yet commenced.
(2)Operating lease payments include $261.5 million related to options to extend lease terms that are reasonably certain of being exercised.
For the fiscal years ended December 26, 2024, December 28, 2023, and December 29, 2022, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $213.6 million, $194.0 million, and $178.0 million, respectively.
Litigation
On November 15, 2021, the Company was added as a defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit, Nguyen v. Inspections Now, Inc., No. 21-DCV-287142, pending in the 434th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas. Bestview International Company (“Bestview International”) is also named as a defendant in the case; former defendants Inspections Now, Inc., Jason Post Homes, LLC and Bestview (Fuzhou) Import & Export Co. LTD have been dismissed. Plaintiff’s petition alleges that “wood paneling” allegedly purchased from the Company was installed in the vicinity of plaintiff’s fireplace and caught fire while the fireplace was lit. The fire consumed plaintiff’s home and resulted in injuries to plaintiff and another occupant and the death of plaintiff’s three children and mother. Plaintiff alleges product defect and failure to warn claims against the Company and product defect, failure to warn, and strict liability claims against Bestview International. Plaintiff’s petition seeks damages in excess of $1.0 million for property damage, personal injury, and wrongful death. The petition also seeks exemplary damages. Plaintiff’s ex-husband, brother, and the additional occupant have since intervened as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Intervenors allege the same claims against the Company and Bestview International and collectively seek damages in excess of $11.0 million for property damage, personal injury (as to the other occupant), wrongful death, and exemplary damages. The Company has answered all petitions, denying the allegations. The case is currently set for trial in the third quarter of fiscal 2025.
The Company maintains insurance that may cover any liability arising out of the above-referenced litigation up to the policy limits and subject to meeting certain deductibles and to other terms and conditions thereof. Estimating an amount or range of possible losses resulting from litigation proceedings is inherently difficult, particularly where the matters involve indeterminate claims for monetary damages and are in the stages of the proceedings where key factual and legal issues have not been resolved. For these reasons, the Company is currently unable to predict the ultimate timing or outcome of or reasonably estimate the possible losses or a range of possible losses that may result from the above-referenced litigation.
On June 18, 2020, an alleged stockholder filed a putative derivative complaint, Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund v. Taylor, et al., No. 2020-0487-JTL, in the Delaware Court of Chancery, purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s officers, directors, and stockholders. The complaint, as amended, alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment. The factual allegations underlying these claims are similar to the factual allegations made in the previously dismissed In re Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The complaint sought unspecified damages and restitution for the Company from the individual defendants and the payment of costs and attorneys’ fees. On September 17, 2024, the defendants entered into a Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement (the “Stipulation”) with the plaintiffs setting forth the terms and conditions of a proposed settlement. The Stipulation provides, among other things, for a full release of the claims that the plaintiffs or any other Company stockholder asserted or could have asserted in the litigation against any of the defendants in exchange for (1) an $8.0 million payment to the Company, net of payment of the fees and expenses of plaintiffs’ counsel, and (2) the Company’s agreement to implement and/or maintain certain corporate governance measures. The settlement was approved by the Court on December 23, 2024, resulting in the dismissal with prejudice of this litigation.
A net recovery of $6.8 million was recorded by the Company in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024 and included as a reduction of general and administrative expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The recovery primarily consists of insurance proceeds, net of plaintiffs’ counsel fees and expenses. As of December 26, 2024, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet included $7.8 million in receivables, net and $1.2 million in trade accounts payable related to the settlement agreement.
The Company is also subject to various other legal actions, claims, and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, which may include claims related to general liability, workers’ compensation, product liability, intellectual property, and employment-related matters resulting from its business activities. As with most actions such as these, an estimation of any possible and/or ultimate liability cannot always be determined. The Company establishes reserves for specific legal proceedings when it determines that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. These various other ordinary course proceedings are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of operations. Regardless of the outcome, however, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors.